Only knowing what is distributed leadership is not enough. To fully understand, one must know its theory as well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45bdf/45bdf93b9419bb01f377e55200895c26a7e95a54" alt="Theory of Distributed Leadership"
Leadership is often considered as something that is acted out or done by an individual to influence others. Social or shared leadership often still sees leadership as activities done by individuals. Yet, with the cooperation with others. Taking a distributed perspective, leadership is a rising resource of the system. It sits between-
- who consider leadership as a result of personal agency and
- who view it as a consequence of the circumstances.
Activity Theory of Distributed Leadership
Activity theory is a comprehensive social science strategy. Thus, it helps us to understand individual behaviour as contextualised in a circumstance. This established viewpoint increases the unit of analysis to the collective rather than individual, and analyses the connection between actions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c493/6c4931f98b3528550546cd6bb09a79018c411a5a" alt="Activity Theory of Distributed Leadership"
Although this proposal aims to learn the individual, the unit of analysis is the more extensive system. For instance, in which that individual participates.
Engestrom recognises three ages of activity theory and associated researcher:
- First-generation (1978). A model concentrated on the individual (subject-object-mediating artefact) by Lev Vygotsky.
- Second generation (1981). The extension of the model to add collective action, by Alexei Leont’ev.
- Third generation (1987). A networked knowledge of interactive activity systems, proposed by Engestrom himself.
Barbara Rogoff, another Activity Theory scholar, develops this work in two ways:
- First- foregrounding of the individual. Dropping sight of the relationship of the system is not acceptable.
- Second- there are three different levels of resolutions-
1. Interpersonal level
2. Cultural/community and
3. Institutional/cultural planes
These are required to read the different level’s activity. An assigned leader takes this networked and multi-level approach to give “Context of Action”. And manage the stress between agency and distribution.
Spillane and Gronn both bring on the use of activity theory in the field of a leadership analysis. As a result, it spread out of Mintzberg’s studies of work activity. Besides witnessing managers through structured observations to document what they do. The nature of this documentation was innovative and exciting.
However, it was eventually considered shallow. As it did not distinguish between managerial and non-managerial tasks. There were still unsettled questions. Questions about how management acted, and it did not show leadership effectiveness.